SDL is written in C. So it can support it without too much trouble. And some people are compiling stuff to run on DOS. So it makes sense. And your objection doesn't hold any water.

No, this bug is specific to iTerm2. As for whether there is something as bad for ghostty floating out there, I would hope not. It's a strong goal for it not to be. In Ghostty (and also the terminal I currently use, WezTerm) modularity is prized. What belongs as a clear add-on feature such as this doesn't get to run without being configured first.

OTOH, in iTerm2, surprising new features seem to be welcome, if not now, in recent memory. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40458135

For me that would mean avoiding tiny commits, and I wouldn't want to do that

> Right now, cf provides commands for just a small subset of Cloudflare products.

Why didn't they vibe code support for more? With this on the heels of EmDash, and this being a technical preview, it feels inconsistent.

If they merge it in despite it having the model version in the commit, then they're arguably taking a position on it too - that it's fine to use code from an AI that was trained like that.

If he was doing what he said in the README, perhaps. But the sort of monetization he's doing is a lot slimier than that. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47724010

This should be hurting the reputation of Chrome Web Store more than it is hurting the reputation of Open Source browser extensions. It's impossible to keep tabs on all Open Source developers, so a highly trusted platform like Fedora or installing and updating things one by one is needed.

It's far from ideal, but I've been meaning to start using one personal meta-extension so I can have ctrl-d on Grok delete the next character, do my own custom readability overlays, and other stuff that comes to mind. It would have a clear association between sites and customizations, and possibly sandboxed code (e. g. WebAssembly).

> This should be hurting the reputation of Chrome Web Store more than it is hurting the reputation of Open Source browser extensions.

Does the Chrome Web Store have any reputation left at this point? I don't know how much lower its reputation can go.

On LowEndTalk: https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4767400/#Comment_4...

Inheritance is used here:

https://github.com/thalesfp/snapstate/blob/ba8a8d7ce25d6a4ef...

I'm not sure if it would support inheriting from a custom store very well. It might get tricky with the templating. But the author of this seems to have done a good job of not ignoring inheritance.

Personally this library isn't to my taste - but I successfully use classes (without inheritance) along with reactivity primitives to create beautiful, tiny and high performance React applications

I went through the code, and it is roughly equivalent to doing it without classes. The nesting level in the example isn't deep - everything seems to be beneath a SnapStore or a SnapFormStore, without inheriting from user defined classes. I think the use of classes is fine, and the way that it's introduced in the blog post is good, it says "plain TypeScript classes". It is used as a means for ergonomically writing and understanding the code more than it is for setting up invariants or complex polymorphism.